Home Blog Page 290

mind expansion

0
<br />

Beans from Brazil, two chickens for a fiver, organic free range hand-knitted eggs, Egyptian strawberries in Fairtrade chocolate for Valentine?s day. Why is it that our food choices seems to get more and more difficult? What we eat and where we shop has never been more talked about – helped along by by the likes of Jamie, Hugh and Gordon and a large dollop of obesity.

Closer to home the debate has been simmering about a new supermarket chain coming to the Island. Global retail giant Tesco has been suggested. More stores would mean better competition and lower prices, we?re told. The States appear to support this notion, so they asked people if they wanted cheaper food and more choice. As long as there are bears and woods we know the answer to this. These are important questions, but life, as we know, is more complicated. Money off our weekly staples sounds very appealing but where would this food come from and where would the profits go? Not here.

Let?s look at the expansion of Farm Shops on the Island in the last 5 years, ranging from the side-of-the-road honesty boxes (long may they last) right up to those shops on farms that sell almost anything. These are Jersey farmers who have diversified, either by going organic, like Vermont Farm, creating delicious cheeses and milk, like Classic Farm or by growing into one-stop shops selling bread, meat, fish alongside fruit, vegetables, herbs and interesting grocery bits, like Holme Grown and Rondel?s.

Richard Rondel has been running his farm shop in St John since April 05, and turned over an impressive £1m in the first full year of trading. Keen to build on his success and create something more, he visited farm shops in Daylesford in Gloucestershire and Chatsworth, on the Duke of Devonshire?s estate, to see how their model could be brought to Jersey. It is a philosophy of sustainability, working with local growers, suppliers and smaller independent companies, here and in the UK, to create a friendly shopping experience.

Working in consultation with architect Saskia Lee and conservation expert, Aaron Le Couteur, Richard has a holistic vision to create a new site on the field in front of his farm. Saskia has drawn up plans of a light, organic structure made of timber, stone, slate, glass and granite. One that is human in scale rather than a slab of a shed or the lymeswold vernacular favoured by supermarket chains. She says, ?I wanted to create a building that sits as peacefully in the environment as possible. Some elevations have been designed to be as transparent as possible, bringing down the barriers between ?inside and outside? ?. Energy efficiency and using eco products in the build have also been important considerations. Aaron has recommended that nesting boxes for barn owls and house martins, orchards of native trees and a wild flower meadow be introduced to the new site to encourage wildlife.

Richard is committed to pursuing education facilities for children and adults through schemes such as school allotments in the surrounding fields, an exhibition and seminar space in the new building and cameras in the nesting boxes. Rondel?s would be more than somewhere to pop in and buy supper, it would be a pleasing shopping environment that involved the community in the seasons and the countryside.

Last month, Jersey Chamber of Commerce commissioned Prof Sparks from the Institute of Retail Studies to analyse the viability of introducing a third supermarket. His recommendation was overwhelmingly against the proposal on all counts, adding that a major new operator, which may well develop a monopoly position (Tesco have 28% of the UK market), would end up diminishing choice for local consumers.

Rondel?s new building hasn?t yet received planning consent. Meanwhile the Waterfont is being cleared. Which way do we want to go in Jersey? We have local shops and markets that are the envy of towns and cities in the UK, desperate to reverse 80s and 90s retail policy that favoured out-of-town shopping. Do we want local businesses to grow and flourish, thereby increasing competition and sustainability, or do we want cheaper food whatever the cost? Do we want to push our trolleys down endless lonely supermarket aisles or chat to the butcher about his homemade sausages? The questions aren?t straightforward but the answer is up to each of us.

beauty news flash

0

Power up your lashes
Clinique has created a new 24 hour mascara that actually lasts with the new lash power mascara. The long wearing formula was developed for humid Asian environments, and has better resistance against rain, tears, sweat, sebum and humidity.  So no more looking like a goth in a rainstorm!

Lash Power Mascara £10.50

Stripped Down

The new N collection from M·A·C is for those of you daring enough to strip your make up down to natural shades, with mineralised skinfinishes. It?s a seductive and sensual way to wear make-up, when you want a more subtle look.

M·A·C  lipstick  Creamy Light Pink  £9.50

TS2 Detailer @ Rio

Paul Mitchell has recently designed these nifty little ceramic straighteners. Measuring only 15 cm long, they are a perfect size to slip into your handbag (or manbag). They heat up to 200 degrees celsius, so despite their size, there is no compromise on the quality and results they produce.

Paul Mitchell TS2 Detailer ceramic flat iron £17

Kérastase @ Toni & Guy

Sold in only the most prestigious salons, our favourite French haircare brand is finally available from Toni & Guy.  Check out the new range of products, Noctogenist, an overnight treatment to revitalise your hair.. It?s perfect for those of you who can?t find the time of day to treat your hair.  Just apply before bed and wake up in the morning with soft nourished locks.

Kerastase Noctogenist Serum Nuit & Voile Nuit both £24 each

Subtly defined lips

New this month are these Pure Colour UltraLight Glosses and Lip Shaping Gloss Pencils from Estée Lauder.  With a new, limited edition lightweight gloss formula, the glosses glide onto lips ready for puckering up. With 2 limited edition shades, you?re going to have to be quick before they go.
Pure Colour UltraLight Glosses and Lip Shaping Gloss Pencils £12 each

<br />

Peter Thompson

0
<br />

Local artist Peter Thomson has recently returned to the island after completing a bachelor of science, first class honours degree in Textile design for Fashion and Interiors at Huddersfield University. He will be exhibiting a selection of prints and textiles made while studying at Univeristy called ?Sample? at the Jersey Pottery in Whitespace this month. The opening night is the 18th February, 6pm till 8pm, and after that the exhibition is open to the public for approximately 2 weeks finishing on 29th February.

<br/>

?During my time at university, I challenged myself to keep my work as original and fresh as possible, from each module to the next. Thanks to this there is a good juxtaposition of design content, fabric, paper pieces, colour and technique. Substrates used, were heat transferable dyes, manutex dyestuffs, oil paint, foils, tissue and inks.  Textiles were produced using CAD design then digital printing onto various textiles such as wool, cotton silk and polyester silks. Some textiles were then printed onto using opaque dyes and metallic.  Subjects that inspired me have been driven from both light and dark places.?

The exhibit will include pieces from various modules of his studies including print which he specialised in.  We look forward to seeing his original themed work ?winter garden?, ?stone the crows? and ?the frivolity of Buddha?.

Getting Cross

0

On the whole, I approve of property rights. The whole communism movement has never really floated my boat ? partly because I like to see some connection between my labour and my (entirely reasonable) salary, but also because I am unable to think of a single car or building (or boat for that matter) built by socialists which has had an ounce of aesthetic merit. I can appreciate that pure utilitarian design can have a certain beauty, but a system which incarcerates novelists, artists and thinkers for their political views is always going to struggle to get the best out of people.

Of course, in an ideal communist state, everybody would be provided for according to their needs (which is fine so long as they realise that my needs extend to a wine cellar, racing yacht and car collection), and so there would be no need for charities. Clearly, this would be catastrophic in Jersey as it would result in a legion of ladies of a certain age who had hitherto kept themselves entertained with charitable activities having absolutely nothing to do ? causing a predictably devastating effect on the alcoholism, domestic violence and divorce statistics. In fact, the whole fabric of society would quickly crumble into a morass of drinking, fighting and fornicating (thus fulfilling the JEP?s dearest wish as all its complaints about behaviour in town on a Friday night finally become reality).

As it is, charitable causes get a particularly warm reception over here as wallets laden with cash and guilt are lightened in equal measure by teams of fundraisers desperate to do the right thing. However, in my view the problems start when charities become businesses and start paying out thousands or even millions of pounds on advertising and wages ? funds which frankly would be better spent elsewhere. Fortunately there are websites out there (such as http://www.charitynavigator.org) which identify which charities spend the most and the least on administration thus enabling people to make sure that the money they donate actually does what they want it to.

Now, I?m not naïve to the extent that I expect multi-million pound projects to be managed entirely by volunteers and I?m perfectly happy to accept that a charity

such as the NSPCC should pay money to corporate behemoths so as to ensure that people are aware of child abuse and the need to stop it, but is a minute-long advert setting out gruesome tales of abuse really helping anyone? I reckon that if someone is actively abusing children, they?ve probably reached a mental state where watching an advert on TV, no matter how harrowing, isn?t going to make a jot of difference.

I know that this is probably the wrong message, but all I get from the process is that the NSPCC would like to let us know how horrible child abuse is, so we then donate money to them, so that they can pay for more adverts about how horrible child abuse is. I can save them the trouble ? if you are reading this and are somehow in two minds over whether child abuse is or isn?t a bad thing, you should know that i) it is a very bad thing and ii) if you do it, you will go to jail where you will be introduced to a man called Bubba who will make you realise how deeply unpleasant a romantic evening in can be.

So what do charities have to do with property rights, you might ask (if you haven?t stopped bothering looking for joined-up discussion long ago)? Simple. The Red Cross in America is currently engaged in a dispute with Johnson & Johnson (a major US manufacturer of health supplies) over the use of the red cross symbol. You may think that as the Red Cross is called, well, the Red Cross, that they had the right to use the red cross symbol as they liked. In which case you?d be wrong. And you?d be severely overestimating the morals of American lawyers.

Although the organisations which popularised the red cross as a sign for medics in wartime predate our friends at Johnson x2, it was the latter who registered a trademark application for the symbol in 1887, a whole thirteen years before the American Red Cross received its charter from the US Congress. Apparently, the founder of the Red Cross had in 1895 entered into an agreement with J&J which gave it the exclusive use of the symbol for drug, chemical and surgical products.

This arrangement worked fine for a hundred years or so, but recently the Red Cross have started trying to licence the symbol to other companies to raise money ? their funds having dried up in the last year due to, ironically, a lack of high-profile American disasters (apparently the sight of homeless millionaires after the Malibu fires provoked more schadenfreude than anything else). Jsquared have taken exception to this development and their lawyers are demanding that the Red Cross should hand over the profits it has made together with any unsold stocks. The whole thing sounds like a recipe for PR suicide (even considering that JJ have donated US$5m to the Red Cross over the last three years), but it throws into relief the problems caused where intellectual property rights are claimed over an image or phrase that, to all intents and purposes, is already in the public domain.

You?ve probably heard of daft publicity-courting efforts like Posh Spice trying to copyright the word ?Posh? or Paris Hilton trying to copyright the phrase ?That?s Hot? but imagine if someone were to try to claim the image of Mont Orgueil or Corbiere as their own property and stop others using it. Sounds mad? If I set up Corbiere Studios limited and had an image of the lighthouse as my logo at the start of every film, what?s to stop me claiming that the use of that image in connection with films as a trademark? People would associate the image with my business and so surely I should be able to protect it from exploitation? It?s this balancing act of public and private interests that keeps us lawyers thinking ? and for every hour we spend thinking, someone ends up getting the bill?

Balloonatic

0
<br />

Bored this winter? So was Kent Couch. In  a bid to outdo rival Sir Richard Branson, the 47 year old petrol station owner filled 105 balloons with helium, attached them to his favourite garden chair, then sat back and drifted away.

His bizarre adventure took him from Oregon in the US, to the neighbouring state of Idaho.About nine hours later, he came back to earth in a farmer?s field, a little way from home (about 193 miles to be precise). Thats roughly the distance from Jersey to London and a much cheaper option than flying. Don?t all rush out to Ransom?s just yet though, we wouldn?t recommend re-creating his balloon adventure at home. In a previous attempt in September, Mr Couch got off the ground for six hours using a pellet gun to pop the balloons,  but he went into a rapid descent and eventually had to parachute to safety.

?When you?re a little kid and you?re holding a helium balloon, it has to cross your mind?.

Male topi antelope?s sex burden

Choosy males and aggressive females – a role reversal has been found in the sexual behaviour of the topi antelope. Some males are so forcefully pursued by pushy females that they refuse the advances of previous partners.

According to research published in the journal Current Biology, this helps males conserve their sperm for the possibility of mating with new females. It therefore increases the chances of fatherhood with the widest possible number of partners.

Dr Jakob Bro-Jorgensen, the scientist conducting the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) research, said: ?In cases where the male antelope was free to choose between females, he deliberately went for the most novel mate, rather than the most high-ranking.?
He added: ?However, some pushy females were so aggressive in their pursuit of the male that he actually had physically to attack them to rebuff their advances.?
The research was undertaken in the Masai Mara area of Kenya, in the traditional breeding grounds of the topi.

Copious copulations
Females are fertile for a single day only. The topi antelope (Damaliscus lunatus jimela) come together once a year, for just over a month to mate.

Dr Bro-Jorgensen said: ?It is not uncommon to see males collapsing with exhaustion as the demands of the females get too much for them.?

He observed that each female would mate, on average, with four males, while some reached 12 different partners. And each individual would be mated with approximately 11 times, although one pair was observed together on 36 occasions.

Unexpected behaviour
These findings are contrary to conventional sexual selection theory which says males are competitive and females are choosy. Talking to the BBC News website, Dr Bro-Jorgensen said: ?We may not have our eyes open to the fact that opposite sexual conflicts may occur more commonly than we think. Normally, males are persistent and females resistant. What I saw in African topi was unexpected.?
The synchronised mating activity, and the species? promiscuity, makes males the limited resource and females the competitive ones.

It is thought the females are interested in mating with several partners to ensure fertilisation, in case their first choice happens to have reduced sperm supply, or is genetically incompatible with them.

the gallery rally – a veterans’ guide

0
<br />

It?s only February, but we?ve had 28 entries for this year?s first Gallery Rally already and it?s getting closer every day. In all the excitement we managed to pin down Tour de La Liberation veterans Garry Taylor and Mike Nolan for an interview, to find out what this year?s entrants have to look forward to.

1) So, you?re a rally veteran, what got you started?

Jan Dart, basically! She used to work at States Computer Services (where I now work) and as an entrant in the very first Tour in 1997, she happened to pop into work and was handing out flyers to recruit potential teams for the 1998 Tour. Having read the info, the idea of a drive around France on a treasure hunt whilst also raising money for charity seemed like a very good way of combining something we both enjoy immensely (i.e. driving on decent roads whilst seeing the beautiful scenery of France) . A phone call to Mike that evening, and that was us signed up!

2) How many times have you done the route?

We?ve taken part ever since the second Tour (if we had known about the first tour in 1997, we?d have been there too) ? so that?s now 9 & we?ve never looked back since. We?ve enjoyed every single moment of every year, and we were obviously at a loss as to what to do this year in its absence.

3) I?ve heard on the grapevine you?ve won before.. what did
you win!?

We have indeed won a few times ? 5 to be exact, not that we?re keeping count! 1998 (3rd), 1999 (2nd), 2000 (1st), 2001 (1st), 2002 (9th ? don?t ask!), 2003 (1st), 2004 (1st), 2005 (4th) and 2006 (1st). The prize was generally a silver salver and the coveted ?Dart Trophy? (named after Jan and Alan Dart who won the first year?s Tour and donated this as a prize for every year following) ? but basically it?s not the winning, it?s the taking part !

4) What is your best memory? I?m sure you have a few funny stories you can tell us . . .

One of the enjoyable parts of the tour is every evening back at the Hotel discussing the highlights of the day, the route, the fiendishly cunning questions that Chip sets, and also the misfortunes of other competitors? navigational skills over a nice cold beer or two! As the years have gone on, the technology?s got better ? i.e. Sat Nav became the gadget of choice , which often took us some rather curious routes (not always what we would call ?roads?) and had people laughing at us for our reliance on technology. There was one occasion where it took us to where it believed the town we were searching for was located, but it turned out to be nothing more than a public lavatory in the middle of nowhere!

5) And your worst?

Looking back, we can?t really think of any ?worst? memories as such, although nearly being taken out by a speeding lorry jack-knifing in a hail storm wasn?t one of the best memories. Failing to solve any of Chip?s clues is also extremely annoying, but knowing how proud it makes him feel when nobody gets the answer right makes it more acceptable! Generally, the final day when we arrive back at St Malo prior to the return to Jersey, knowing we won?t be doing it again for another year, is the low point of every trip.

6) What can people expect who?ve signed up?

Four days of excellent driving, fantastic scenery, lovely French towns, good company, and fine hotels ? not forgetting the questions, which are a cross between a road going version of the famous Channel 4 series hosted by Anneka Rice ? ?Treasure Hunt?, and a cryptic crossword. All that, and it?s for a good cause, so what more can anyone ask for?!

7) Any tips to help me win (or all the other treasure hunters out there)?

Tips to help people win; don?t follow us! We make it up as we go along and contrary to popular belief, it?s mostly luck! Chances are we?d lead you to the wrong town anyway! (not deliberately either!)

End of the romance? These days it’s all about the status update

0
<br />

Breaking up has always been hard to do, but now, thanks to Facebook it?s just that little bit harder. In this cruel social network, as soon as a relationship is over, instead of weeping into a pillow and watching re-runs of Sex and the City you are forced to change your ?relationship status? on Facebook. The finality of the whole situation will obviously make the break up harder to take, and when your ex also changes their status to ?single? this will be the icing on top of a very bitter cake.
In this crazy age of Facebook, perhaps the first thing you might ask a friend after a break up is – ?Did you take them off of your Facebook yet??

A friend of mine, who was recently left heartbroken after splitting up with a partner of three years, admitted that the hardest part of the break-up, was declaring themself as single on their profile. This just solidified the end and although that?s in some ways a good thing – we all know the best way to move on is through closure, I could still understand where my heartbroken friend was coming from.

When you do finally pluck up the courage to change your relationship status, it?s not exactly a pleasant task. Your choices are: ?Married? , ?Engaged? , ?In a relationship with…? , ?In an open relationship? or ?Single?. And as you go from an ?In a relationship with?? to ?Single? to add salt to the wound, you?re asked, ?Are you sure you want to terminate the relationship?? Now if you ask me, that?s just cruel.

But it doesn?t stop there. Oh no. As if all of this ego-battering wasn?t enough, the brutal Facebook Gods have added another relationship option. You can now choose ?It?s complicated?. The problem with this pathetic and insignificant option is that you might not even know ?it?s complicated?. Picture the situation: one day you happily log on to your profile and check your boyfriend?s page. ?Joe Bloggs went from being ?In a relationship? to ?It?s complicated?. Cue an angry phone call and perhaps a status change to ?Single? and looking for ?Random play?.

This deceleration of a break up is clearly going to be hard, but when 300 of your on-line friends all write on your wall to check you?re ok it may be all a bit much to take. You might even get a sympathetic poke off a couple of people, and a drawing on your graffiti wall of a flower. It?s sad but true. I remember my friend Laura once commenting that she had ended her on-line relationship in the morning, and she found it hard to believe that by the afternoon the concerned wall posts had started to flood in.

But it doesn?t stop there. Oh no. As if all of this ego-battering wasn?t enough, the brutal Facebook Gods have added another relationship option. You can now choose ?It?s complicated?.

It doesn?t stop there though. After all of this bother with status changing, do you ultimately remove your ex from your friends? You don?t want to log on, on a Wednesday lunch time, only to be told in your super feed that so-and-so has been tagged in 30 photos, 19 people have written on their wall and they have been voted the ?most desired for marriage? in some silly application. It?s just not necessary. But obviously instead of simply ignoring this, you will look at their profile for at least an hour, perhaps accounting for some of the 233 million office hours lost monthly due to Facebook use.

So here is my advice. Remove them from your friends, leave the network that you are both in and cut off any other way that you may be able to see their new life on-line.

Don?t get me wrong though, Facebook is by far the best networking tool I have ever used and I will also say that there is something shamefully fun in looking through photos of someone that you barely know, but as for relationships on Facebook, the best advice I can give is leave your status unmarked.

Facebook has taught me that being in a relationship is complex, but no matter how complicated it gets, you shouldn?t need a Facebook label to describe it.